Bolam v First Secretary of State & Ors [2006] EWHC 2184 (Admin) (10 July 2006)
The claimant is entitled to three-quarters of his costs incurred in seeking the injunction and section 288(5) order, as the proceedings were justified by the circumstances, but not all costs are awarded due to partial success and some procedural delay.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 2184 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Brian Bolam; First Defendant: First Secretary of State; Second Defendant: Wychaven District Council; Third Defendant: Timothy Bolam
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law Costs Application / Post Judgment Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Claimant awarded three-quarters of costs incurred in seeking injunction and section 288(5) order; quantum to be determined by detailed assessment if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Injunctions, Planning Permission Conditions, Enforcement Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Bolam
Claimant
First Secretary of State
First Defendant
Wychaven District Council
Second Defendant
Timothy Bolam
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Costs Application / Post Judgment Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to costs for seeking an injunction and a section 288(5) suspension order
- 2 Whether the costs incurred were proportionate and justified
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant is entitled to three-quarters of his costs incurred in seeking the injunction and section 288(5) order, as the proceedings were justified by the circumstances, but not all costs are awarded due to partial success and some procedural delay.
Court Disposition
Claimant awarded three-quarters of costs incurred in seeking injunction and section 288(5) order; quantum to be determined by detailed assessment if not agreed.
Orders
- Claimant to receive three-quarters of all costs incurred, including costs for the day of hearing and prior applications.
- If parties cannot agree on quantum, costs to be subject to detailed assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment