Bayat & Ors v Cecil & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 523 (11 May 2011)
Appellants, being successful on appeal, are entitled to their costs of the appeal and, save as otherwise ordered, of the claim below. Respondents to pay one third of Appellants' costs up to a specified date below, reflecting overall failure. Repayment of sums paid under previous order with interest is ordered.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Civ 523
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Ehsanollah Bayat; Defendant/appellant: Telephone Systems International Inc.; Defendant/appellant: Afghan Wireless Communications Company; Defendant/appellant: Mark Warner; Claimant/respondent: Lord Michael Cecil; Claimant/respondent: Stuart Bentham; Claimant/respondent: Alexander Grinling; Claimant/respondent: Joakim Lehmkuhl
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Costs Judgment Following Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Appellants awarded costs of appeal and, save as otherwise set out, of the claim; Respondents to pay one third of Appellants' costs below to a specified date; Respondents to repay £375,000 plus interest; interim payments ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeal, Assessment of Costs, Interest on Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ehsanollah Bayat
Defendant/appellant
Telephone Systems International Inc.
Defendant/appellant
Afghan Wireless Communications Company
Defendant/appellant
Mark Warner
Defendant/appellant
Lord Michael Cecil
Claimant/respondent
Stuart Bentham
Claimant/respondent
Alexander Grinling
Claimant/respondent
Joakim Lehmkuhl
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Costs Judgment Following Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to costs following appeal
- 2 Allocation of costs for applications below
- 3 Repayment of sums paid under previous order
Ratio Decidendi
Appellants, being successful on appeal, are entitled to their costs of the appeal and, save as otherwise ordered, of the claim below. Respondents to pay one third of Appellants' costs up to a specified date below, reflecting overall failure. Repayment of sums paid under previous order with interest is ordered.
Court Disposition
Appellants awarded costs of appeal and, save as otherwise set out, of the claim; Respondents to pay one third of Appellants' costs below to a specified date; Respondents to repay £375,000 plus interest; interim payments ordered.
Orders
- Appellants entitled to costs of appeal, subject to detailed assessment on standard basis.
- Appellants not entitled to costs of unsuccessful application for permission to appeal on forum issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment