Shergill v Purewal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 815 (22 June 2011)
Both parties bore responsibility for failing to resolve the justiciability issue at an early stage; the judge erred by criticising only the defendants. A fairer costs order is to deprive both parties of costs after the relevant date, except for the costs of the application for a stay.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Civ 815
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Daljit Singh Shergill; Defendant/appellant: Rajinder Singh Purewal; Defendant/appellant: PTI Derby Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Appeal From High Court Costs Order Following Stay of Libel Action
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Justiciability, Libel, Religious Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daljit Singh Shergill
Claimant/respondent
Rajinder Singh Purewal
Defendant/appellant
PTI Derby Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal From High Court Costs Order Following Stay of Libel Action
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court judge erred in his exercise of discretion regarding costs after staying a libel action as non-justiciable due to religious doctrinal issues.
Ratio Decidendi
Both parties bore responsibility for failing to resolve the justiciability issue at an early stage; the judge erred by criticising only the defendants. A fairer costs order is to deprive both parties of costs after the relevant date, except for the costs of the application for a stay.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- No order for costs after 17 June 2010 except for costs of the application for a stay; judge's order before 17 June 2010 and for the application for a stay left untouched.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment