Costello & Anor v Macdonald & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 86 (10 February 2012)
The successful party on appeal is entitled to costs of the appeal and related applications; costs below to be assessed on the standard basis; no indemnity basis or payment on account warranted given the mixed outcome and parties' respective entitlements and liabilities.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 86
- Parties
- Appellants: Costello & Anor; Respondents: MacDonald & Ors; Party to Contract: Oakwood
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Costs Determination Following Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; costs orders made as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeals, Counterclaims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Costello & Anor
Appellants
MacDonald & Ors
Respondents
Oakwood
Party to Contract
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Costs Determination Following Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to costs following appeal
- 2 Costs of application for permission to cross-appeal
- 3 Costs relating to claim and counterclaim
Ratio Decidendi
The successful party on appeal is entitled to costs of the appeal and related applications; costs below to be assessed on the standard basis; no indemnity basis or payment on account warranted given the mixed outcome and parties' respective entitlements and liabilities.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; costs orders made as specified.
Orders
- Respondents to pay Mr and Mrs Costello's costs of the appeal and application to cross-appeal.
- Respondents to pay Mr and Mrs Costello's costs of defending the claim, except for the balance of costs on the preliminary issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment