Jones & Ors v Secretary of State for Energy And Climate Change & Ors [2012] EWHC 3647 (QB) (21 December 2012)
The claimants were the successful party in the litigation as a whole and are entitled to their costs, subject to a 20% reduction to reflect the defendants' success on the discrete issues of causation of bladder cancer and basal cell carcinoma. The reduction is assessed broadly, not by time spent at trial. Disclosure of relevant CFA and disbursement funding agreement provisions is ordered, but not of privileged correspondence. The application for interest on disbursements is adjourned for further hearing, with directions for disclosure of particulars of disbursements.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 3647
- Parties
- Claimant: Jeffrey Jones and Others; First Defendant: The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change; Second Defendant: Coal Products Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Group Litigation Order (glo) Personal Injury / Post Trial Costs Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendants to pay 80% of claimants' costs of the action as assessed. Application for interest on disbursements adjourned. Disclosure of relevant CFA and disbursement funding agreement provisions ordered. No order for disclosure of privileged correspondence.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Limitation, Causation, Disclosure, Interest on Disbursements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeffrey Jones and Others
Claimant
The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change
First Defendant
Coal Products Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Group Litigation Order (glo) Personal Injury / Post Trial Costs Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants or defendants were the successful party for costs purposes
- 2 Whether claimants' entitlement to costs should be reduced for partial success or failure on certain issues (bladder cancer, skin cancer)
- 3 Whether interest on disbursements is payable and under what circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants were the successful party in the litigation as a whole and are entitled to their costs, subject to a 20% reduction to reflect the defendants' success on the discrete issues of causation of bladder cancer and basal cell carcinoma. The reduction is assessed broadly, not by time spent at trial. Disclosure of relevant CFA and disbursement funding agreement provisions is ordered, but not of privileged correspondence. The application for interest on disbursements is adjourned for further hearing, with directions for disclosure of particulars of disbursements.
Court Disposition
Defendants to pay 80% of claimants' costs of the action as assessed. Application for interest on disbursements adjourned. Disclosure of relevant CFA and disbursement funding agreement provisions ordered. No order for disclosure of privileged correspondence.
Orders
- Defendants to pay 80% of claimants' costs of the action as assessed.
- Application for interest on disbursements adjourned to 25 March 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment