Mehjoo v Harben Barker (a firm) & Anor [2013] EWHC 1669 (QB) (14 June 2013)
The Claimant beat his Part 36 offer and is entitled to indemnity costs from 12 October 2012, with interest at 10% above base rate post-offer and 2% above base pre-offer; the First Defendant is entitled to its costs against the Claimant; the Claimant is entitled to 95% of his costs against the Second Defendant, subject to set-off for certain issues; the Claimant is entitled to indemnity for Grant Thornton disclosure costs; an interim payment of £1.7 million is ordered; no stay is granted but Defendants have liberty to apply; time to appeal is 21 days from judgment.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 1669
- Parties
- Claimant: Hossein Mehjoo; First Defendant: Harben Barker (A Firm); Second Defendant: Harben Barker Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial, Costs and Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Claim against First Defendant dismissed; judgment for Claimant against Second Defendant for £1,192,546.02; costs and consequential orders as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Part 36 Offers, Interest on Judgments, Disclosure, Indemnity Costs, Interim Payments, Stay of Execution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hossein Mehjoo
Claimant
Harben Barker (A Firm)
First Defendant
Harben Barker Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial, Costs and Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to costs between parties, including standard vs indemnity basis
- 2 Effect of Part 36 offer and whether it was beaten
- 3 Appropriate rate of interest on damages and costs
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant beat his Part 36 offer and is entitled to indemnity costs from 12 October 2012, with interest at 10% above base rate post-offer and 2% above base pre-offer; the First Defendant is entitled to its costs against the Claimant; the Claimant is entitled to 95% of his costs against the Second Defendant, subject to set-off for certain issues; the Claimant is entitled to indemnity for Grant Thornton disclosure costs; an interim payment of £1.7 million is ordered; no stay is granted but Defendants have liberty to apply; time to appeal is 21 days from judgment.
Court Disposition
Claim against First Defendant dismissed; judgment for Claimant against Second Defendant for £1,192,546.02; costs and consequential orders as specified.
Orders
- Claimant to pay First Defendant's costs, to be assessed if not agreed.
- Second Defendant to pay Claimant £1,192,546.02 plus interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment