Vyas & Anor v Goraya, (t/a Taj Construction Roofing) [2016] EWCA Civ 1304 (20 December 2016)
The appeal failed on all points except a trivial increase in damages; costs claimed were disproportionate to the minor success achieved; no order as to costs is appropriate.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 1304
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Prakash Vyas; Claimant/appellant: Minaxi Vyas; Defendant/respondent: Raj Goraya, T/A Taj Construction Roofing
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- No order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeals, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Prakash Vyas
Claimant/appellant
Minaxi Vyas
Claimant/appellant
Raj Goraya, T/A Taj Construction Roofing
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to costs on appeal
- 2 Adjustment of damages awarded
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal failed on all points except a trivial increase in damages; costs claimed were disproportionate to the minor success achieved; no order as to costs is appropriate.
Court Disposition
No order as to costs
Orders
- No order as to costs incurred in the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment