Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v Sandoz AG & Ors [2022] EWHC 1603 (Pat) (20 June 2022)
Each generic defendant (Teva and Sandoz) is to pay the costs of its own action, with Teva solely liable for costs up to the commencement of Sandoz's action; Astellas is awarded an interim payment of 60% of its costs, apportioned between Teva and Sandoz as specified; permission to appeal is granted on the interaction of legal principles relating to obviousness and technical contribution.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1603 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant/part 20 Defendant in HP 2020 000046: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited; Claimant/part 20 Defendant in HP 2021 000005: Sandoz AG; Defendant/part 20 Claimant HP 2020 000046 & HP 2021 000005: Astellas Pharma Inc; Part 20 Defendant in HP 2020 000046 & HP 2021 000005: Teva UK Limited; Part 20 Defendant in HP 2020 000046 & HP 2021 000005: Sandoz Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Litigation (costs and Permission to Appeal Hearing) / Post Judgment Consequentials Hearing
- Outcome
- Costs order made as specified; interim payment of 60% of Astellas's costs awarded; permission to appeal granted.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Obviousness, Permission to Appeal, Joint and Several Liability, Issue Based Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Claimant/part 20 Defendant in HP 2020 000046
Sandoz AG
Claimant/part 20 Defendant in HP 2021 000005
Astellas Pharma Inc
Defendant/part 20 Claimant HP 2020 000046 & HP 2021 000005
Teva UK Limited
Part 20 Defendant in HP 2020 000046 & HP 2021 000005
Sandoz Limited
Part 20 Defendant in HP 2020 000046 & HP 2021 000005
Procedural Posture
Patent Litigation (costs and Permission to Appeal Hearing) / Post Judgment Consequentials Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate allocation of costs between multiple defendants in patent litigation
- 2 Whether to order joint and several liability for costs
- 3 Appropriate percentage for interim costs award
Ratio Decidendi
Each generic defendant (Teva and Sandoz) is to pay the costs of its own action, with Teva solely liable for costs up to the commencement of Sandoz's action; Astellas is awarded an interim payment of 60% of its costs, apportioned between Teva and Sandoz as specified; permission to appeal is granted on the interaction of legal principles relating to obviousness and technical contribution.
Court Disposition
Costs order made as specified; interim payment of 60% of Astellas's costs awarded; permission to appeal granted.
Orders
- Each defendant to pay the costs of its own action.
- Teva solely liable for costs up to commencement of Sandoz's action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment