Kingsridge Ltd v Stavrou & Anor (Re Costs) [2024] EWHC 1755 (Ch) (18 April 2024)
The only unequivocally wasted costs were counsel's fees for the day, which should be paid in full by the applicant to the respondent. All other costs are reserved for future determination.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 1755 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Kingsridge Limited; First Defendant: Mr Mario Stavrou; Second Defendant: Paddington Management Company (Sussex Gardens) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application in Civil Proceedings / Post Hearing Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs reserved except for counsel's fees, which are ordered to be paid by the applicant to the respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Interim Injunctions, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kingsridge Limited
Claimant
Mr Mario Stavrou
First Defendant
Paddington Management Company (Sussex Gardens) Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Application in Civil Proceedings / Post Hearing Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs of the hearing should be awarded and to whom
- 2 Whether counsel's fees were wasted and should be paid by the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The only unequivocally wasted costs were counsel's fees for the day, which should be paid in full by the applicant to the respondent. All other costs are reserved for future determination.
Court Disposition
Costs reserved except for counsel's fees, which are ordered to be paid by the applicant to the respondent.
Orders
- Applicant to pay respondent £4,500 plus VAT (if applicable) for counsel's fees within 14 days
- All other costs reserved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment