Attersley v UK Insurance Ltd [2025] EWHC 884 (KB) (11 April 2025)
Upon allocation to the multi-track, Section IIIA of Part 45 and the fixed costs regime are disapplied retrospectively; therefore, CPR 36.20 does not apply and the claimant is entitled to costs assessed on the standard basis up to the expiry of the relevant period of the Part 36 offer.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 884 (KB)
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Miss Laura Attersley; Respondent/defendant: UK Insurance Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court at Southend
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Fixed Costs Regime, Part 36 Offers, Multi Track Allocation, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss Laura Attersley
Appellant/claimant
UK Insurance Limited
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court at Southend
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether CPR 36.20 applies to costs in ex-Protocol personal injury claims allocated to the multi-track after late acceptance of a Part 36 offer
- 2 Whether fixed costs or standard basis costs are recoverable up to expiry of the relevant period of a Part 36 offer
Ratio Decidendi
Upon allocation to the multi-track, Section IIIA of Part 45 and the fixed costs regime are disapplied retrospectively; therefore, CPR 36.20 does not apply and the claimant is entitled to costs assessed on the standard basis up to the expiry of the relevant period of the Part 36 offer.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Claimant entitled to costs assessed on the standard basis up to expiry of the relevant period of the Part 36 offer
- Defendant to pay claimant's costs accordingly
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment