P & O Nedlloyd BV v Utaniko Ltd
CPR 36.21 does not entitle a claimant to indemnity costs in appeal proceedings unless a Part 36 offer is made specifically for the appeal; absent such an offer or exceptional conduct, costs are awarded on a standard basis.
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: P & O Nedlloyd B V; Claimant/respondent: Utaniko Limited; Defendant/appellant: Dampskibsselskabet AF, 1912 Aktieselskab; Defendant/appellant: Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg; Claimant/respondent: East West Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Costs Determination After Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Respondents awarded costs of the appeal on a standard basis; respondents to pay costs of the hearing on 12 February.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Part 36 Offers, Appeal Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P & O Nedlloyd B V
Defendant/appellant
Utaniko Limited
Claimant/respondent
Dampskibsselskabet AF, 1912 Aktieselskab
Defendant/appellant
Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg
Defendant/appellant
East West Corporation
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Costs Determination After Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether CPR 36.21 applies to costs in appeal proceedings absent a Part 36 offer in the appeal
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis under CPR 44.3
Ratio Decidendi
CPR 36.21 does not entitle a claimant to indemnity costs in appeal proceedings unless a Part 36 offer is made specifically for the appeal; absent such an offer or exceptional conduct, costs are awarded on a standard basis.
Court Disposition
Respondents awarded costs of the appeal on a standard basis; respondents to pay costs of the hearing on 12 February.
Orders
- Respondents to have their costs of the appeal on a standard basis, set off against other costs of the appeal.
- Respondents to pay the costs of the hearing on 12 February.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment