Gordon v Harry
The trial judge made a material error in the exercise of his discretion regarding the allocation of trial costs, as he intended Mr Harry to pay only one-third of the trial costs but ordered two-thirds. The appellate court exercised its discretion afresh and amended the order accordingly.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Juliet Beverly Gordon; Defendant/applicant: Brian Paul Harry
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal Out of Time; Appeal on Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; extension of time granted; costs order varied
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Discretion of Trial Judge, Appeal Out of Time, Beneficial Ownership, Order for Sale
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Juliet Beverly Gordon
Claimant/respondent
Brian Paul Harry
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal Out of Time; Appeal on Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in the exercise of discretion regarding the costs order for the trial
- 2 Whether the appellant should be granted an extension of time to appeal the costs order
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge made a material error in the exercise of his discretion regarding the allocation of trial costs, as he intended Mr Harry to pay only one-third of the trial costs but ordered two-thirds. The appellate court exercised its discretion afresh and amended the order accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; extension of time granted; costs order varied
Orders
- Time for lodging appellant's notice extended to date of filing
- Permission to appeal out of time granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment