Jobson v Record & Anor

The application for permission to appeal was refused because the point raised by Dr Record regarding fabricated evidence was available at trial and not pursued; there was no real prospect of success on appeal as the judge's findings on costs and Mr Jobson's conduct were justified on the evidence before him.

Parties: Claimant/respondent: John Michael Jobson; First Defendant/applicant: Christopher Oswald Record; Second Defendant: Suzanne Marie Record
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 17 August 2005
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (costs Order)
Outcome: Application for extension of time granted; application for permission to appeal refused.
Legal Topics: Costs, Extension of Time, Permission to Appeal

Civil Procedure Costs Extension of Time Permission to Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

John Michael Jobson

Claimant/respondent

Christopher Oswald Record

First Defendant/applicant

Suzanne Marie Record

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (costs Order)

Legal Issues

1 Whether to grant extension of time for filing appellant's notice
2 Whether permission to appeal the costs order should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time granted; application for permission to appeal refused.

Orders

Extension of time to file appellant's notice granted to 15th July 2005.
Permission to appeal the costs order refused.