Hullock v East Riding of Yorkshire County Council

Hullock v East Riding of Yorkshire County Council

The exaggerated and unsuccessful claim for special damages was the central issue and had real costs consequences. The claimant should be liable for the defendant's costs after the interim payment, as the dispute would have been settled without the exaggerated claim. The real winner was the defendant.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Mary Hullock; Defendant/appellant: East Riding of Yorkshire County Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (costs Only) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Costs
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Costs, Exaggeration of Claims, Quantum of Damages, Contributory Negligence
Civil Procedure Personal Injury Costs Exaggeration of Claims Quantum of Damages Contributory Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Hullock

Claimant/respondent

East Riding of Yorkshire County Council

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (costs Only) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Who is the successful party for the purposes of costs in a personal injury action where the claim was exaggerated?
  2. 2 What is the effect of an interim payment on the allocation of costs?
  3. 3 Should the claimant be penalised in costs for exaggerating her claim for special damages?

Ratio Decidendi

The exaggerated and unsuccessful claim for special damages was the central issue and had real costs consequences. The claimant should be liable for the defendant's costs after the interim payment, as the dispute would have been settled without the exaggerated claim. The real winner was the defendant.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Defendant to pay claimant's costs up to 13 April 2006
  • Claimant to pay defendant's costs thereafter