Mahan Air & Anor v Blue Sky One Ltd & Ors
The Mahan Parties are liable for their own costs in the renewed application for permission to appeal regarding Aircraft 2's location, must pay PK's costs for the unsuccessful application to adduce new evidence, and must pay PK and the Balli Parties' costs for applications for security for costs, imposition of conditions on appeal, and stay of execution. Costs of granted renewed applications for permission to appeal are costs in the appeals. All costs to be assessed on the standard basis if not agreed. Interim payments of £45,000 to PK and £25,000 to the Balli Parties are ordered.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Mahan Air; Appellant/defendant: Blue Sky Aviation Co FZE; Claimant/respondent: Blue Sky One Limited; Claimant/respondent: Blue Sky Two Limited; Claimant/respondent: Blue Sky Three Limited; Claimant/respondent: Balli Group PLC; Claimant/respondent: Crypton Limited; Claimant/respondent: Blue Sky Six Limited; Claimant/respondent: Blue Sky Four Limited; Claimant/respondent: Blue Sky Five Limited; Defendant/appellant: Blue Airways LLC; Claimant/respondent: PK AirFinance US Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Costs Determination After Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs orders made against the Mahan Parties; interim payments ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeals, Security for Costs, Interim Payments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mahan Air
Appellant/defendant
Blue Sky Aviation Co FZE
Appellant/defendant
Blue Sky One Limited
Claimant/respondent
Blue Sky Two Limited
Claimant/respondent
Blue Sky Three Limited
Claimant/respondent
Balli Group PLC
Claimant/respondent
Crypton Limited
Claimant/respondent
Blue Sky Six Limited
Claimant/respondent
Blue Sky Four Limited
Claimant/respondent
Blue Sky Five Limited
Claimant/respondent
Blue Airways LLC
Defendant/appellant
PK AirFinance US Inc
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Costs Determination After Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Which parties are liable for costs following the judgment of 11 May 2011
- 2 Entitlement to costs for various applications including permission to appeal, adducing new evidence, security for costs, and stay of execution
- 3 Appropriate interim payments on account of costs
Ratio Decidendi
The Mahan Parties are liable for their own costs in the renewed application for permission to appeal regarding Aircraft 2's location, must pay PK's costs for the unsuccessful application to adduce new evidence, and must pay PK and the Balli Parties' costs for applications for security for costs, imposition of conditions on appeal, and stay of execution. Costs of granted renewed applications for permission to appeal are costs in the appeals. All costs to be assessed on the standard basis if not agreed. Interim payments of £45,000 to PK and £25,000 to the Balli Parties are ordered.
Court Disposition
Costs orders made against the Mahan Parties; interim payments ordered.
Orders
- Mahan Parties to bear their own costs for renewed application for permission to appeal on Aircraft 2 location.
- No order as to costs for other parties in relation to the ex parte application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment