French v Groupama Insurance Company Ltd
Groupama's offer did not meet the requirements for a Part 36 or quasi-Part 36 offer, was privileged when made, and only became admissible after judgment by agreement. The judge erred in applying Stokes and treating the offer as open. Fairness under Part 44 requires no order as to costs, except that Groupama should pay Miss French's costs up to 21 days after the February 2007 offer.
- Parties
- Claimant / Appellant: Heather French; Defendant / Respondent: Groupama Insurance Company Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Costs
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Settlement Offers, CPR Part 36, Privilege, Litigant in Person
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Heather French
Claimant / Appellant
Groupama Insurance Company Ltd
Defendant / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 How should a pre-litigation offer to settle be treated in light of CPR Part 36 and relevant case law?
- 2 Was Groupama's offer privileged or open?
- 3 Should costs consequences under Part 36 apply to Groupama's offer?
Ratio Decidendi
Groupama's offer did not meet the requirements for a Part 36 or quasi-Part 36 offer, was privileged when made, and only became admissible after judgment by agreement. The judge erred in applying Stokes and treating the offer as open. Fairness under Part 44 requires no order as to costs, except that Groupama should pay Miss French's costs up to 21 days after the February 2007 offer.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judge's order that Miss French pay all Groupama's costs quashed
- No order as to costs except Groupama to pay Miss French's costs up to 8 March 2007
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment