Costello & Anor v Macdonald & Ors
Mr and Mrs Costello, having succeeded on appeal and in defending the claim, are entitled to their costs of the appeal, the application for permission to cross-appeal, and defending the claim, except for the balance of costs on the preliminary issue. No order for costs on the counterclaim as it was only between respondents and Oakwood. Oakwood remains liable for respondents’ costs of the claim (excluding those against Mr and Mrs Costello) and counterclaim.
- Parties
- Appellants: Costello & Anor; Respondents: Macdonald & Ors; Party to Contract: Oakwood
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Costs Determination After Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; costs orders made as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeal, Counterclaim, Cross Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Costello & Anor
Appellants
Macdonald & Ors
Respondents
Oakwood
Party to Contract
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Costs Determination After Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to costs following appeal
- 2 Costs of application for permission to cross-appeal
- 3 Costs relating to claim and counterclaim
Ratio Decidendi
Mr and Mrs Costello, having succeeded on appeal and in defending the claim, are entitled to their costs of the appeal, the application for permission to cross-appeal, and defending the claim, except for the balance of costs on the preliminary issue. No order for costs on the counterclaim as it was only between respondents and Oakwood. Oakwood remains liable for respondents’ costs of the claim (excluding those against Mr and Mrs Costello) and counterclaim.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; costs orders made as specified.
Orders
- Respondents to pay Mr and Mrs Costello’s costs of the appeal.
- Respondents to pay Mr and Mrs Costello’s costs of the application for permission to cross-appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment