Tuson v Murphy
Where a defendant makes an unconditional Part 36 offer with knowledge of the claimant's material non-disclosure, it is not unjust to apply the default costs rule under CPR 36.13(5), and the claimant should not be deprived of pre-offer costs unless subsequent events undermine the defendant's assessment at the time of the offer.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Anna Louise Tuson; Respondent/defendant: Debbie Murphy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Costs Order After Acceptance of Part 36 Offer
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Part 36 Offers, Non Disclosure, Dishonesty, Quantum of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anna Louise Tuson
Appellant/claimant
Debbie Murphy
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Costs Order After Acceptance of Part 36 Offer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in depriving the claimant of pre-offer costs due to non-disclosure and alleged dishonesty when the defendant made an unconditional Part 36 offer with knowledge of the non-disclosure.
- 2 Whether it was 'unjust' under CPR 36.13(6) to apply the normal costs consequences after late acceptance of a Part 36 offer.
Ratio Decidendi
Where a defendant makes an unconditional Part 36 offer with knowledge of the claimant's material non-disclosure, it is not unjust to apply the default costs rule under CPR 36.13(5), and the claimant should not be deprived of pre-offer costs unless subsequent events undermine the defendant's assessment at the time of the offer.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Defendant to pay claimant's costs up to 8 October 2015.
- Claimant to pay defendant's costs from 8 October 2015 to 1 December 2015.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment