Lonsdale v Bar Standards Board & Ors
Although the defendant succeeded on the jurisdiction issue, the court found it disproportionate to award the full costs claimed due to the small sum in dispute and the public interest in resolving the jurisdictional question. A summary assessment of £5,000 was deemed appropriate.
- Parties
- Claimant: Ms Marion Lonsdale; First Defendant: Bar Standards Board; Second Defendant: Dr Ann Barker; Third Defendant: Disciplinary Tribunal of the Council of the Inns of Court
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Costs Judgment
- Outcome
- Claimant ordered to pay costs to the defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Jurisdiction, Disciplinary Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Marion Lonsdale
Claimant
Bar Standards Board
First Defendant
Dr Ann Barker
Second Defendant
Disciplinary Tribunal of the Council of the Inns of Court
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Costs Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should pay the defendant's costs of the disciplinary proceedings following the resolution of the jurisdiction issue (Ground 2)
Ratio Decidendi
Although the defendant succeeded on the jurisdiction issue, the court found it disproportionate to award the full costs claimed due to the small sum in dispute and the public interest in resolving the jurisdictional question. A summary assessment of £5,000 was deemed appropriate.
Court Disposition
Claimant ordered to pay costs to the defendant.
Orders
- Claimant to pay the defendant £5,000 as costs of the hearing of 8 October 2014, summarily assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment