A v B & Ors
The claimant's initiation of English proceedings in breach of the arbitration and jurisdiction agreements constituted a serious departure from the norm, justifying indemnity costs to compensate the defendants fully. The claimant's conduct, including attempts to litigate issues already subject to arbitration and in other jurisdictions, misuse of the English court, and disregard for cost-efficient dispute resolution, warranted judicial disapproval and indemnity costs. No exceptional circumstances displaced this approach for any defendant except Company E, which was not a party to the arbitration agreement but was unnecessarily joined, also justifying indemnity costs.
- Parties
- Claimant: A; First Defendant: B; Second Defendant: C; Third Defendant: D; Fourth Defendant: Company E
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Costs Application / Post Judgment Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs awarded in favour of all defendants on an indemnity basis, with interim payments and interest ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Jurisdiction Clauses, Arbitration Agreements, Interim Payments, Interest on Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Claimant
B
First Defendant
C
Second Defendant
D
Third Defendant
Company E
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Costs Application / Post Judgment Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity or standard basis for proceedings brought in breach of an arbitration agreement
- 2 Whether interim payments on account of costs should be ordered
- 3 Whether interest on costs should be awarded and from what date
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's initiation of English proceedings in breach of the arbitration and jurisdiction agreements constituted a serious departure from the norm, justifying indemnity costs to compensate the defendants fully. The claimant's conduct, including attempts to litigate issues already subject to arbitration and in other jurisdictions, misuse of the English court, and disregard for cost-efficient dispute resolution, warranted judicial disapproval and indemnity costs. No exceptional circumstances displaced this approach for any defendant except Company E, which was not a party to the arbitration agreement but was unnecessarily joined, also justifying indemnity costs.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded in favour of all defendants on an indemnity basis, with interim payments and interest ordered.
Orders
- Claimant to pay First Defendant (B) costs on an indemnity basis, with an interim payment of £600,000 forthwith, interest at 8% from 9 May 2006.
- Claimant to pay Second Defendant (C) costs on an indemnity basis, with an interim payment of £490,000 forthwith, interest at 8% from 9 May 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment