RB (Adult) (No 3) , Re
MF’s claim for compensation is dismissed for lack of legal and factual foundation. No order for costs is made in favour of MF or the Official Solicitor against the local authority. MF is ordered to pay 20% of the Official Solicitor’s costs from 4 August 2005 to 30 September 2010 due to his unreasonable conduct and pursuit of meritless issues, but not for the central or sexual abuse issues.
- Parties
- Claimant: A London Borough; First Defendant: RB (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor); Second Defendant: MF
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Post Trial, Costs and Compensation Determination
- Outcome
- Applications by MF for compensation and costs against the local authority dismissed; Official Solicitor’s application for costs against the local authority dismissed; MF to pay 20% of the Official Solicitor’s costs from 4 August 2005 to 30 September 2010.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Compensation, Abuse of Process, Best Interests, Litigation Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A London Borough
Claimant
RB (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
First Defendant
MF
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Family / Post Trial, Costs and Compensation Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether MF is entitled to compensation from the local authority
- 2 Whether MF or the Official Solicitor is entitled to costs, and against whom, for which issues
Ratio Decidendi
MF’s claim for compensation is dismissed for lack of legal and factual foundation. No order for costs is made in favour of MF or the Official Solicitor against the local authority. MF is ordered to pay 20% of the Official Solicitor’s costs from 4 August 2005 to 30 September 2010 due to his unreasonable conduct and pursuit of meritless issues, but not for the central or sexual abuse issues.
Court Disposition
Applications by MF for compensation and costs against the local authority dismissed; Official Solicitor’s application for costs against the local authority dismissed; MF to pay 20% of the Official Solicitor’s costs from 4 August 2005 to 30 September 2010.
Orders
- MF’s applications against the local authority for compensation and costs are dismissed.
- The Official Solicitor’s application against the local authority for costs is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment