Mears Ltd v Costplan Services (South East) Ltd & Ors
Although the claimant succeeded on some factual and legal issues, it failed on the overarching aim of preventing practical completion. The court must weigh the issues and overall outcome, resulting in the claimant being ordered to pay 40% of the second and third defendants' costs, with interim payments ordered.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mears Ltd; First Defendant: Costplan Services (South East) Ltd; Second Defendant: Plymouth (Notte Street) Limited; Third Defendant: J. R. Pickstock Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (construction/commercial) / Costs Ruling After Trial
- Outcome
- Claimant to pay 40% of second and third defendants' costs; interim payments ordered; first defendant to bear own costs; permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Injunctions, Practical Completion, Estoppel by Convention, Rectification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mears Ltd
Claimant
Costplan Services (South East) Ltd
First Defendant
Plymouth (Notte Street) Limited
Second Defendant
J. R. Pickstock Limited
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction/commercial) / Costs Ruling After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate costs order following trial on practical completion and related declarations
- 2 Entitlement to interim payment of costs
Ratio Decidendi
Although the claimant succeeded on some factual and legal issues, it failed on the overarching aim of preventing practical completion. The court must weigh the issues and overall outcome, resulting in the claimant being ordered to pay 40% of the second and third defendants' costs, with interim payments ordered.
Court Disposition
Claimant to pay 40% of second and third defendants' costs; interim payments ordered; first defendant to bear own costs; permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Claimant to pay 40% of third defendant's costs.
- Claimant to pay 40% of second defendant's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment