McKeown v Langer [2021] EWCA Civ 1792 (26 November 2021)
A Calderbank offer that is not disclosed or admissible at the relevant stage does not require the court to defer a costs order; CPR 44.2 gives the judge discretion to make an immediate costs order based on all the circumstances, and there is no requirement to treat Calderbank offers as equivalent to CPR Part 36 offers.
- Citation
- [2021] EWCA Civ 1792
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: John McKeown; Respondent/petitioner: Diana Langer
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Appeal From High Court Costs Order Following Split Trial in Unfair Prejudice Petition
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Unfair Prejudice Petitions, CPR 44.2 Discretion, Calderbank Offers, CPR Part 36 Offers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John McKeown
Appellant/respondent
Diana Langer
Respondent/petitioner
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal From High Court Costs Order Following Split Trial in Unfair Prejudice Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Calderbank offer (without prejudice save as to costs) must be treated as equivalent to a CPR Part 36 offer for the purposes of costs discretion under CPR 44.2 in split trial litigation where the offer's terms are not disclosed to the court.
Ratio Decidendi
A Calderbank offer that is not disclosed or admissible at the relevant stage does not require the court to defer a costs order; CPR 44.2 gives the judge discretion to make an immediate costs order based on all the circumstances, and there is no requirement to treat Calderbank offers as equivalent to CPR Part 36 offers.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Immediate costs order in favour of respondent upheld
- No requirement to defer costs decision due to undisclosed Calderbank offer
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment