Cullen v Freed & Ors [2000] EWHC 9017 (Costs) (10 November 2000)

Cullen v Freed & Ors [2000] EWHC 9017 (Costs) (10 November 2000)

The Judge held that enhancement should be allowed based on the weight and complexity of the case and the responsibility of the senior fee earner, but not based on the outcome of the litigation. Enhancement of 33% was awarded on all profit costs except for the senior fee earner's documents item, which received 75%.

Citation
[2000] EWHC 9017 (Costs)
Parties
Claimant: Cullen; Defendants: Freed & Ors
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 November 2000
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment (professional Negligence) / Appeal From District Judge's Costs Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Costs Assessment, Enhancement of Costs, Legal Aid Remuneration, Professional Negligence by Solicitors

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cullen

Claimant

Freed & Ors

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Costs Assessment (professional Negligence) / Appeal From District Judge's Costs Decision

  1. 1 Whether enhancement of profit costs should be allowed and at what rate
  2. 2 What factors are relevant to enhancement under the Legal Aid in Civil Proceedings (Remuneration) Regulations 1994

Ratio Decidendi

The Judge held that enhancement should be allowed based on the weight and complexity of the case and the responsibility of the senior fee earner, but not based on the outcome of the litigation. Enhancement of 33% was awarded on all profit costs except for the senior fee earner's documents item, which received 75%.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Enhancement of 33% on all profit costs except for the senior fee earner's documents item
  • Enhancement of 75% on the senior fee earner's documents item