Global Marine Drillships Ltd. v La Bella & Ors [2010] EWHC 2498 (Ch) (11 October 2010)

Global Marine Drillships Ltd. v La Bella & Ors [2010] EWHC 2498 (Ch) (11 October 2010)

The court determined that, given the urgency and seriousness of the committal application, a higher than guideline hourly rate was justified but reduced the claimed rate and hours to reasonable levels. Counsel's fees were found reasonable. The rest of the costs claimed were confirmed.

Citation
[2010] EWHC 2498 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Global Marine Drillships Ltd; First Defendant: William La Bella; Second Defendant: Landmark Solicitors LLP; Third Defendant: Salina Jayne Jones; Fourth Defendant: Charles Barber and Sons Ltd; Fifth Defendant: James Edward Barber
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment Following Dismissal of Committal Application / Summary Assessment of Costs
Outcome
Costs summarily assessed in favour of the First Defendant, with reductions to hourly rate, preparation hours, and Counsel's fees.
Legal Topics
Costs Assessment, Committal Applications, Freezing Orders
Civil Procedure Costs Assessment Committal Applications Freezing Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Global Marine Drillships Ltd

Claimant

William La Bella

First Defendant

Landmark Solicitors LLP

Second Defendant

Salina Jayne Jones

Third Defendant

Charles Barber and Sons Ltd

Fourth Defendant

James Edward Barber

Fifth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Costs Assessment Following Dismissal of Committal Application / Summary Assessment of Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate amount of costs to be awarded to the First Defendant following dismissal of the committal application?

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, given the urgency and seriousness of the committal application, a higher than guideline hourly rate was justified but reduced the claimed rate and hours to reasonable levels. Counsel's fees were found reasonable. The rest of the costs claimed were confirmed.

Court Disposition

Costs summarily assessed in favour of the First Defendant, with reductions to hourly rate, preparation hours, and Counsel's fees.

Orders

  • Hourly rate reduced to £400 plus VAT.
  • Preparation hours allowed at 13 hours.