Dockerill & Anor v Tullett [2012] EWCA Civ 184 (24 February 2012)
For minor personal injury claims settled for less than £1,000, costs of CPR 21.10(2) approval proceedings are to be assessed under CPR 44.5, not fixed costs or small claims track costs. On assessment, the necessity and proportionality of instructing solicitors or counsel must be scrutinised, and costs may be limited if not justified by complexity. Counsel's attendance fee at approval hearings is only recoverable if necessity is specifically established by the circumstances of the case.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 184
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Master Corby Dockerill (a Minor by his mother and Litigation Friend Mrs Zoe Dockerill); Claimant/appellant: Demi Healey (a Minor by her mother and Litigation Friend Mrs Zoe Dockerill); Defendant/respondent: Mr S. Tullett; Claimant/appellant: Master Paddy Macefield (a Minor by his Litigation Friend Paula Macefield); Defendant/respondent: Janos Bakos; Claimant/respondent: Rebecca Tubridy (by her Litigation Friend Mrs D Westwood); Defendant/appellant: Mohammed Sarwar
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Costs Issues in Minor Personal Injury Settlements
- Outcome
- Appeals in Dockerill and Macefield dismissed; appeal in Tubridy allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Fixed Costs Regime, Personal Injury Claims by Minors, CPR 21.10(2), CPR 45 Part II, CPR 44.5, CPR 27.14, Counsel's Fees as Disbursement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Master Corby Dockerill (a Minor by his mother and Litigation Friend Mrs Zoe Dockerill)
Claimant/appellant
Demi Healey (a Minor by her mother and Litigation Friend Mrs Zoe Dockerill)
Claimant/appellant
Mr S. Tullett
Defendant/respondent
Master Paddy Macefield (a Minor by his Litigation Friend Paula Macefield)
Claimant/appellant
Janos Bakos
Defendant/respondent
Rebecca Tubridy (by her Litigation Friend Mrs D Westwood)
Claimant/respondent
Mohammed Sarwar
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Costs Issues in Minor Personal Injury Settlements
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs of CPR 21.10(2) approval proceedings for minors' personal injury claims under £1,000 are subject to fixed costs or detailed assessment; whether detailed assessment should be limited by small claims track costs; whether counsel's attendance fee at approval hearing is a recoverable disbursement under CPR 45.10(2)(c)
Ratio Decidendi
For minor personal injury claims settled for less than £1,000, costs of CPR 21.10(2) approval proceedings are to be assessed under CPR 44.5, not fixed costs or small claims track costs. On assessment, the necessity and proportionality of instructing solicitors or counsel must be scrutinised, and costs may be limited if not justified by complexity. Counsel's attendance fee at approval hearings is only recoverable if necessity is specifically established by the circumstances of the case.
Court Disposition
Appeals in Dockerill and Macefield dismissed; appeal in Tubridy allowed.
Orders
- Costs in Dockerill and Macefield to be assessed under CPR 44.5 with scrutiny of necessity and proportionality; counsel's attendance fee in Tubridy not recoverable absent specific necessity.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment