Shaw v Medtronic Corevalve LLC & Ors [2017] EWHC 1646 (QB) (05 July 2017)
The appropriate order is that costs should be assessed on the standard basis, as the conduct and nature of the claims, while unusual and close to meriting indemnity costs, do not justify departing from the standard basis in all the circumstances.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 1646 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Gabriele Shaw; First Defendant: Medtronic Corevalve LLC; Second Defendant: Jean Claude Laborde; Third Defendant: Medtronic Inc; Fourth Defendant: Medtronic Limited; Fifth Defendant: Medtronic PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Assessment Following Discontinuance and Strike Out
- Outcome
- Costs to be assessed on the standard basis.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Indemnity Costs, Standard Costs, Pre Action Protocol, Strike Out, Discontinuance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gabriele Shaw
Claimant
Medtronic Corevalve LLC
First Defendant
Jean Claude Laborde
Second Defendant
Medtronic Inc
Third Defendant
Medtronic Limited
Fourth Defendant
Medtronic PLC
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Assessment Following Discontinuance and Strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be assessed on the indemnity basis or standard basis
- 2 Relevance of pre-action protocol compliance
- 3 Nature and conduct of claims and amendments
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate order is that costs should be assessed on the standard basis, as the conduct and nature of the claims, while unusual and close to meriting indemnity costs, do not justify departing from the standard basis in all the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Costs to be assessed on the standard basis.
Orders
- Claimant to pay the costs of all five defendants.
- Costs to be assessed on the standard basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment