Morgan & Anor v Hinton Organics (Wessex) Ltd & Ors
The application raises a sufficiently compelling issue of general importance about the Aarhus Convention's relevance to costs discretion, justifying adjournment for further submissions and notice to respondents and the Government Department.
- Parties
- Appellants: Morgan & Anr; Respondents: Hinton Organics (Wessex) Limited & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal; Adjourned for Further Submissions
- Outcome
- Application adjourned for further submissions and notice to respondents and DEFRA; appeal to follow if permission granted.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Discretion, Aarhus Convention, Access to Environmental Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Morgan & Anr
Appellants
Hinton Organics (Wessex) Limited & Ors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal; Adjourned for Further Submissions
Legal Issues
- 1 Relevance of the Aarhus Convention in judicial discretion on costs
- 2 Whether the issue can be raised on appeal despite not being raised before the trial judge
Ratio Decidendi
The application raises a sufficiently compelling issue of general importance about the Aarhus Convention's relevance to costs discretion, justifying adjournment for further submissions and notice to respondents and the Government Department.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned for further submissions and notice to respondents and DEFRA; appeal to follow if permission granted.
Orders
- Adjourn application to open court with notice to respondents.
- Serve notice of appeal and supporting documents on DEFRA and invite written submissions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment