Wedgwood Museum Trust Ltd, Re [2012] EWHC 1974 (Ch) (19 July 2012)
All parties' costs are to be paid out of the assets of the company as part of the costs and expenses of the administration, except that the administrators' costs of briefing Leading Counsel are disallowed as unnecessary. The Attorney General, as a necessary representative party, should not be ordered to pay costs despite being unsuccessful. Assessment of costs will be on the indemnity basis for the administrators (excluding disallowed costs) and on the standard basis for other parties.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 1974 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Robert Michael Young and Stephen John Currie (joint administrators of Wedgwood Museum Trust Limited); First Defendant: Her Majesty's Attorney General; Second Defendant: Wedgwood Pension Plan Trustee Limited; Third Defendant: The Pension Protection Fund
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Determination Following Application for Directions in Administration / Post Judgment, Costs Ruling
- Outcome
- Costs order made: all parties' costs (except disallowed costs of briefing Leading Counsel for administrators) to be paid out of the assets of the company; costs to be assessed if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Administration, Costs Out of Assets, Role of Attorney General in Charity Proceedings, Assessment of Legal Costs, Right of Recoupment, Indemnity and Standard Basis Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Michael Young and Stephen John Currie (joint administrators of Wedgwood Museum Trust Limited)
Claimant
Her Majesty's Attorney General
First Defendant
Wedgwood Pension Plan Trustee Limited
Second Defendant
The Pension Protection Fund
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Determination Following Application for Directions in Administration / Post Judgment, Costs Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether all parties' costs should be paid out of the assets of the company in administration
- 2 Whether the Attorney General should be ordered to pay costs as an unsuccessful party
- 3 Whether the administrators' costs of briefing Leading Counsel should be disallowed
Ratio Decidendi
All parties' costs are to be paid out of the assets of the company as part of the costs and expenses of the administration, except that the administrators' costs of briefing Leading Counsel are disallowed as unnecessary. The Attorney General, as a necessary representative party, should not be ordered to pay costs despite being unsuccessful. Assessment of costs will be on the indemnity basis for the administrators (excluding disallowed costs) and on the standard basis for other parties.
Court Disposition
Costs order made: all parties' costs (except disallowed costs of briefing Leading Counsel for administrators) to be paid out of the assets of the company; costs to be assessed if not agreed.
Orders
- All parties' costs to be paid out of the assets of the company as part of the costs and expenses of the administration.
- Administrators' costs of briefing Leading Counsel (Mr Adkins QC) are disallowed and not recoupable from the assets.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment