Chaudhary, R (on the application of) v Bristol Crown Court & Anor [2015] EWHC 723 (Admin) (18 March 2015)
The power to award costs in criminal matters in the Crown Court is governed exclusively by the Criminal Procedure Rules following the repeal and amendment of the relevant enabling powers; Rule 12 of the Crown Court Rules 1982 no longer applies to criminal matters, and the Crown Court lacks inherent jurisdiction to award costs in such cases. The order for costs against the claimant was therefore wrong and must be quashed.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 723 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Mohammad Mumtaz Chaudhary; 1st Defendant: Bristol Crown Court; 2nd Defendant: HMRC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Costs Determination Following Substantive Judgment
- Outcome
- Order for costs against the claimant quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Criminal Proceedings, Jurisdiction of Crown Court, Interpretation of Procedural Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohammad Mumtaz Chaudhary
Claimant
Bristol Crown Court
1st Defendant
HMRC
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Costs Determination Following Substantive Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Crown Court has jurisdiction to award costs in applications under section 59 Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 after the implementation of the Criminal Procedure Rules
- 2 Whether Rule 12 of the Crown Court Rules 1982 remains in force for such costs awards
- 3 Whether the Crown Court has inherent jurisdiction to award costs in these circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The power to award costs in criminal matters in the Crown Court is governed exclusively by the Criminal Procedure Rules following the repeal and amendment of the relevant enabling powers; Rule 12 of the Crown Court Rules 1982 no longer applies to criminal matters, and the Crown Court lacks inherent jurisdiction to award costs in such cases. The order for costs against the claimant was therefore wrong and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Order for costs against the claimant quashed.
Orders
- The order as to costs is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment