Clegg & Anor v Guarino [2002] EWCA Civ 1121 (16 July 2002)
The application was dismissed because the issue concerned the exercise of judicial discretion in awarding costs, which does not raise an important point of principle or practice under CPR 52.13, nor is there a compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear the appeal.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1121
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Mr R Clegg; Applicant/claimant: Miss L Diveney; Respondent/defendant: Ms M Guarino
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Estate Administration, Discretion in Costs Orders, Trustee Duties, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr R Clegg
Applicant/claimant
Miss L Diveney
Applicant/claimant
Ms M Guarino
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in ordering the estate to bear half the defendant's solicitor's bill
- 2 Whether the applicants should be responsible for costs given alleged impropriety by the executrix
- 3 Whether the appeal raises an important point of principle or practice under CPR 52.13
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the issue concerned the exercise of judicial discretion in awarding costs, which does not raise an important point of principle or practice under CPR 52.13, nor is there a compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear the appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment