Payne v Caerphilly County Borough Council

Payne v Caerphilly County Borough Council

The Judge applied the wrong test in awarding costs against the claimant, failing to follow the Practice Direction and relevant case law. There were no exceptional circumstances justifying a departure from the general rule that costs should not be awarded against an unsuccessful claimant at the permission stage. The order for costs must be quashed.

Parties
Claimant/applicant: Clive Payne; Defendant/respondent: Caerphilly County Borough Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal Against Costs Order After Refusal of Renewed Application for Permission
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Costs in Judicial Review, Practice Direction CPR Part 54, Summary Assessment of Costs
Civil Procedure Judicial Review Costs in Judicial Review Practice Direction CPR Part 54 Summary Assessment of Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clive Payne

Claimant/applicant

Caerphilly County Borough Council

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Appeal Against Costs Order After Refusal of Renewed Application for Permission

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Deputy High Court Judge erred in awarding costs against the claimant after refusing permission for judicial review
  2. 2 Whether the Judge should have applied the Practice Direction CPR Part 54, paragraphs 8.5 and 8.6, regarding costs at the permission stage
  3. 3 Whether the Judge should have made a summary assessment of costs or ordered detailed assessment

Ratio Decidendi

The Judge applied the wrong test in awarding costs against the claimant, failing to follow the Practice Direction and relevant case law. There were no exceptional circumstances justifying a departure from the general rule that costs should not be awarded against an unsuccessful claimant at the permission stage. The order for costs must be quashed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order for costs made by the Deputy Judge quashed
  • Order for costs of £400 to be paid to the claimant