Yianoma v Bar Standards Board [2023] EWHC 3112 (Admin) (04 December 2023)
Given the BSB's regulatory role, funding structure, the seriousness of the admitted misconduct, the limited success of the appeal, and the risk of a chilling effect on regulatory functions, the fair order is that each party should bear their own costs of the appeal.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 3112 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: David Owusu Yianoma; Defendant/respondent: Bar Standards Board
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (administrative) / Ruling on Costs After Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Each party to bear their own costs of the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Regulatory Appeals, Disciplinary Proceedings, Public Interest in Professional Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Owusu Yianoma
Claimant/appellant
Bar Standards Board
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (administrative) / Ruling on Costs After Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded against the Bar Standards Board in a regulatory appeal where the sanction was varied but the appeal was not wholly successful
Ratio Decidendi
Given the BSB's regulatory role, funding structure, the seriousness of the admitted misconduct, the limited success of the appeal, and the risk of a chilling effect on regulatory functions, the fair order is that each party should bear their own costs of the appeal.
Court Disposition
Each party to bear their own costs of the appeal.
Orders
- No order as to costs; each party to bear their own costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment