Simpson v MGN Ltd & Anor [2015] EWHC 126 (QB) (27 January 2015)
Good reason existed to depart from approved budget due to procedural circumstances and conduct of both parties; claimant entitled to recover costs but subject to deductions for procedural failures and unnecessary costs incurred by defendant.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 126
- Parties
- Claimant: Daniel Peter Simpson; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: MGN Limited; Part 20 Defendant: Stephanie Ward
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Post Preliminary Issue Hearing; Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Claimant awarded costs subject to deductions.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Management, Summary Assessment of Costs, Practice Direction Compliance, Defamatory Meaning, Strike Out Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Peter Simpson
Claimant
MGN Limited
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Stephanie Ward
Part 20 Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Post Preliminary Issue Hearing; Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is entitled to recover costs for applications not included in approved costs budget
- 2 Effect of failure to serve costs schedule on entitlement to costs
- 3 Assessment of reasonable costs for applications
Ratio Decidendi
Good reason existed to depart from approved budget due to procedural circumstances and conduct of both parties; claimant entitled to recover costs but subject to deductions for procedural failures and unnecessary costs incurred by defendant.
Court Disposition
Claimant awarded costs subject to deductions.
Orders
- Claimant to recover £10,500 inclusive of VAT for all applications.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment