Joanna Lemos & Ors v Church Bay Trust Company & Ors
The costs management orders dated 11 October 2022 and 30 January 2023 bind the assessment and dictate how the bill of costs should be drawn. The court cannot revise or disapprove agreed budgeted costs, but must take into account any comments recorded on the face of the order regarding reasonableness and proportionality when assessing costs.
- Parties
- Claimant/paying Party: Joanna Lemos; Claimant/paying Party: Miriam Nichols; Claimant/paying Party: Kevin Hellard; Defendant/receiving Party: Church Bay Trust Company; Defendant/receiving Party: Roderick Forrest; Defendant/receiving Party: Kalliopi Lemos; Interested Party: BCR Legal Assist Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment / Preliminary Issue Determination Prior to Detailed Assessment
- Outcome
- Preliminary issue determined; costs management orders bind assessment; comments to be taken into account in detailed assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Management Orders, Costs Budgeting, Detailed Assessment, Reasonableness and Proportionality, Case Management Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joanna Lemos
Claimant/paying Party
Miriam Nichols
Claimant/paying Party
Kevin Hellard
Claimant/paying Party
Church Bay Trust Company
Defendant/receiving Party
Roderick Forrest
Defendant/receiving Party
Kalliopi Lemos
Defendant/receiving Party
BCR Legal Assist Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment / Preliminary Issue Determination Prior to Detailed Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Effect of the costs management order dated 11 October 2022 on detailed assessment of Defendants’ costs
- 2 Effect of judge’s comments recorded in the order and judgment dated 30 January 2023
Ratio Decidendi
The costs management orders dated 11 October 2022 and 30 January 2023 bind the assessment and dictate how the bill of costs should be drawn. The court cannot revise or disapprove agreed budgeted costs, but must take into account any comments recorded on the face of the order regarding reasonableness and proportionality when assessing costs.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issue determined; costs management orders bind assessment; comments to be taken into account in detailed assessment.
Orders
- Costs of this step reserved.
- Detailed assessment to resume on 25 February 2026.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment