Vyas & Anor v Goraya, (t/a Taj Construction Roofing)

Vyas & Anor v Goraya, (t/a Taj Construction Roofing)

The appellants' success was trivial and disproportionate to the costs claimed; therefore, no order as to costs is appropriate.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Prakash Vyas; Claimant/appellant: Minaxi Vyas; Defendant/respondent: Raj Goraya, T/A Taj Construction Roofing
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Costs
Outcome
No order as to costs
Legal Topics
Costs on Appeal, Proportionality of Costs, Minor Success in Appeal
Civil Procedure Costs on Appeal Proportionality of Costs Minor Success in Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Prakash Vyas

Claimant/appellant

Minaxi Vyas

Claimant/appellant

Raj Goraya, T/A Taj Construction Roofing

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellants are entitled to recover their costs on appeal given the minor success achieved

Ratio Decidendi

The appellants' success was trivial and disproportionate to the costs claimed; therefore, no order as to costs is appropriate.

Court Disposition

No order as to costs

Orders

  • No order as to the costs incurred in the appeal