Ghadami v Bloomfield & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 914 (14 July 2015)
The judge exercised discretion appropriately in making no order for costs, having considered all relevant arguments and correspondence; there was no error or oversight justifying permission to appeal.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 914
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Mohammad Reza Ghadami; Respondents/defendants: Paul Bloomfield & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Case Management, Disclosure of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mohammad Reza Ghadami
Applicant/claimant
Paul Bloomfield & Ors
Respondents/defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted against a costs order
- 2 Whether disclosure of correspondence by solicitors should be ordered
Ratio Decidendi
The judge exercised discretion appropriately in making no order for costs, having considered all relevant arguments and correspondence; there was no error or oversight justifying permission to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
- Application for disclosure refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment