Brennan v Prior & Ors [2015] EWHC 3082 (Ch) (28 October 2015)
The order, properly construed, does not limit Mrs. Brennan's personal liability for the Third to Sixth Defendants' costs to the amount of her pecuniary legacy. She is personally liable for the entirety of the assessed costs, and the order is to be amended to make this clear.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 3082 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Chloe Brennan; First Defendant: Anthony Francis Prior; Second Defendant: Andrew George Prior; Third Defendant: Anne Liliane Devillebichot; Fourth Defendant: Jacqueline Cecile Devillebichot; Fifth Defendant: Lucile Simone Noble; Sixth Defendant: Philippe Georges Devillebichot
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Action / Application for Clarification/amendment of Costs Order Post Trial
- Outcome
- Application granted; order to be amended for clarity
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Slip Rule (cpr 40.12), Interpretation of Court Orders, Personal Liability for Costs, Administration of Estates
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chloe Brennan
Claimant
Anthony Francis Prior
First Defendant
Andrew George Prior
Second Defendant
Anne Liliane Devillebichot
Third Defendant
Jacqueline Cecile Devillebichot
Fourth Defendant
Lucile Simone Noble
Fifth Defendant
Philippe Georges Devillebichot
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate Action / Application for Clarification/amendment of Costs Order Post Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's liability for the Third to Sixth Defendants' costs is limited to the amount of her pecuniary legacy under the will
- 2 Whether the slip rule (CPR 40.12) or inherent jurisdiction should be used to clarify or amend the costs order
Ratio Decidendi
The order, properly construed, does not limit Mrs. Brennan's personal liability for the Third to Sixth Defendants' costs to the amount of her pecuniary legacy. She is personally liable for the entirety of the assessed costs, and the order is to be amended to make this clear.
Court Disposition
Application granted; order to be amended for clarity
Orders
- The order is to be amended to add at the start of paragraph 3(2): 'Without limiting the amount of the Claimant's liability for costs pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) above'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment