[2019] EWHC 1401 (Ch)
The court applies the general rule that a litigation friend is liable for costs as the party would be if adult, considering all circumstances. There is no inflexible rule precluding costs orders against litigation friends for defendants. On the facts, Ms Glover is liable for the costs of Mr Barker, Confiànce, Euan (with a 10% reduction), and Ms Meek. No costs orders are made against Tom and Freya personally due to the risk of injustice and their lack of control over the litigation.
- Parties
- Claimant: Iain Paul Barker; First Defendant: Confiànce Ltd; Second Defendant: Euan Barker (a child by his litigation friend Deborah Barker); Third Defendant: Stuart Brown; Fourth Defendant: Joan Barker; Fifth Defendant: Ingrid Heywood; Sixth Defendant: Margot White; Seventh Defendant: Tom Barker (a child by his litigation friend Susan Mary Glover); Eighth Defendant: Freya Barker (a child by her litigation friend Susan Mary Glover); Ninth Defendant: Alison Meek (former litigation friend to Euan Barker); Tenth Defendant: Lauren Chadwick (a child); Eleventh Defendant: Rowan Barker (a child by his litigation friend Deborah Barker)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trusts/probate / Ruling on Costs Applications After Dismissal of Substantive Application
- Outcome
- Costs applications allowed in part; costs orders made against litigation friend (Ms Glover), not against children.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Litigation Friends, Non Party Costs, Representative Proceedings, Trust Litigation, Children as Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Iain Paul Barker
Claimant
Confiànce Ltd
First Defendant
Euan Barker (a child by his litigation friend Deborah Barker)
Second Defendant
Stuart Brown
Third Defendant
Joan Barker
Fourth Defendant
Ingrid Heywood
Fifth Defendant
Margot White
Sixth Defendant
Tom Barker (a child by his litigation friend Susan Mary Glover)
Seventh Defendant
Freya Barker (a child by her litigation friend Susan Mary Glover)
Eighth Defendant
Alison Meek (former litigation friend to Euan Barker)
Ninth Defendant
Lauren Chadwick (a child)
Tenth Defendant
Rowan Barker (a child by his litigation friend Deborah Barker)
Eleventh Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trusts/probate / Ruling on Costs Applications After Dismissal of Substantive Application
Legal Issues
- 1 When can a litigation friend be ordered to pay costs of unsuccessful proceedings brought on behalf of children?
- 2 Are there different principles for costs orders against litigation friends for claimants versus defendants?
- 3 Should costs be ordered against the children themselves?
Ratio Decidendi
The court applies the general rule that a litigation friend is liable for costs as the party would be if adult, considering all circumstances. There is no inflexible rule precluding costs orders against litigation friends for defendants. On the facts, Ms Glover is liable for the costs of Mr Barker, Confiànce, Euan (with a 10% reduction), and Ms Meek. No costs orders are made against Tom and Freya personally due to the risk of injustice and their lack of control over the litigation.
Court Disposition
Costs applications allowed in part; costs orders made against litigation friend (Ms Glover), not against children.
Orders
- Ms Glover to pay the costs of Mr Barker and Confiànce.
- Ms Glover to pay Euan's costs (acting by litigation friends), less 10%.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment