AB & Ors v British Coal Corporation (Department of Trade & Industry)
DTI succeeded in appeal and are entitled to their costs, including application for permission to appeal, to be set off against generic costs payable to CG; no costs order against UDM for appeal; no costs order for DTI regarding excluded evidence or Beresfords' delay; DTI's liability for UDM's second leading counsel limited to 20%.
- Parties
- Claimants: AB & Others; Defendants: British Coal Corporation (Department of Trade & Industry)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Determination in Civil Litigation / Post Judgment Costs Ruling
- Outcome
- DTI awarded costs of appeal against claimants (CG), set off against generic costs; no costs order against UDM for appeal; no costs order for DTI regarding excluded evidence or Beresfords' delay; DTI's liability for UDM's second leading counsel limited to 20%.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Appeals, Non Party Costs Liability, Legal Representation, Evidence Admissibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB & Others
Claimants
British Coal Corporation (Department of Trade & Industry)
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Costs Determination in Civil Litigation / Post Judgment Costs Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Who should bear the costs of the appeal regarding OROS costs selection?
- 2 Should costs be awarded for evidence excluded by court order?
- 3 Should costs be awarded for delay in evidence provision by Beresfords?
Ratio Decidendi
DTI succeeded in appeal and are entitled to their costs, including application for permission to appeal, to be set off against generic costs payable to CG; no costs order against UDM for appeal; no costs order for DTI regarding excluded evidence or Beresfords' delay; DTI's liability for UDM's second leading counsel limited to 20%.
Court Disposition
DTI awarded costs of appeal against claimants (CG), set off against generic costs; no costs order against UDM for appeal; no costs order for DTI regarding excluded evidence or Beresfords' delay; DTI's liability for UDM's second leading counsel limited to 20%.
Orders
- Claimants to pay DTI's costs of appeal, including application for permission to appeal, by set off against generic costs payable to CG.
- No costs order against UDM for appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment