Trident Trust Company (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Modi & Ors [2025] EWHC 3046 (Ch) (02 July 2025)
The court declined to bless the trustee's decision due to insufficient evidence of decision-making, lack of clear acknowledgment and management of conflict of interest, and failure to properly consider alternatives such as renting the property. The trustee's process did not meet the heightened scrutiny required for blessing under Public Trustee v Cooper jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 3046 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Trident Trust Company (Singapore) Pte Limited; First Defendant: Purvi Deepak Modi; Second Defendant: Richard Levin; Third Defendant: Nirav Modi; Fourth Defendant: Marathon House Limited; Fifth Defendant: Rockington Limited; Sixth Defendant: Keystone Investment Holdings Limited; Seventh Defendant: Frandor Limited; Eighth Defendant: The Union of India (through the Directorate of Enforcement)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Application (public Trustee V Cooper Blessing) / Application for Court Blessing of Trustee's Decision
- Outcome
- Application for court blessing refused; no blessing granted.
- Legal Topics
- Court Blessing of Trustee Decisions, Conflict of Interest, Sale of Trust Property, Trustee Borrowing, Beneficiary Participation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trident Trust Company (Singapore) Pte Limited
Claimant
Purvi Deepak Modi
First Defendant
Richard Levin
Second Defendant
Nirav Modi
Third Defendant
Marathon House Limited
Fourth Defendant
Rockington Limited
Fifth Defendant
Keystone Investment Holdings Limited
Sixth Defendant
Frandor Limited
Seventh Defendant
The Union of India (through the Directorate of Enforcement)
Eighth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Trust Application (public Trustee V Cooper Blessing) / Application for Court Blessing of Trustee's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the court bless the trustee's decision to sell trust property at a reduced price and/or enter into a borrowing facility secured against the property?
- 2 Has the trustee properly considered alternatives and disclosed conflicts of interest?
- 3 Is the trustee's decision-making process sufficiently evidenced for heightened scrutiny?
Ratio Decidendi
The court declined to bless the trustee's decision due to insufficient evidence of decision-making, lack of clear acknowledgment and management of conflict of interest, and failure to properly consider alternatives such as renting the property. The trustee's process did not meet the heightened scrutiny required for blessing under Public Trustee v Cooper jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application for court blessing refused; no blessing granted.
Orders
- Trustee may seek adjournment to better evidence decision-making or proceed without court blessing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment