All Seasons Letting Limited & Anor v Rohit Pandya & Anor

All Seasons Letting Limited & Anor v Rohit Pandya & Anor

The application was validly made when the application notice was received by the court with a fee, even if it was the wrong fee. The Unless Order was complied with, and the appeal fails.

Parties
Appellant/defendant: All Seasons Lettings Limited; Appellant/defendant: NTM Limited; Respondent/claimant: Rohit Pandya; Respondent/claimant: Tarlaben Pandya
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 April 2026
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Orders Restoring Claim After Unless Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Court Fees, Applications Under CPR Part 23, Unless Orders, Relief From Sanctions
Civil Procedure Court Fees Applications Under CPR Part 23 Unless Orders Relief From Sanctions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

All Seasons Lettings Limited

Appellant/defendant

NTM Limited

Appellant/defendant

Rohit Pandya

Respondent/claimant

Tarlaben Pandya

Respondent/claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Orders Restoring Claim After Unless Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an application is 'made' for the purposes of an unless order if the wrong fee is tendered
  2. 2 Whether payment of the correct fee is a condition precedent to making an application under CPR Part 23.5

Ratio Decidendi

The application was validly made when the application notice was received by the court with a fee, even if it was the wrong fee. The Unless Order was complied with, and the appeal fails.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal against both orders refused