Sumners Ltd v London Borough Of Hammersmith & Fulham [2002] EWCA Civ 703 (2 May 2002)
The landlord's obligation to repair arose only upon notice, which was not proven to have been given before January 1998. The trial judge applied the correct standard of proof. The costs orders were within the judge's discretion and no error of principle was shown.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 703
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Sumners Limited; Defendant/respondent: The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Covenant to Repair, Notice Requirement, Damages Assessment, Costs Orders, Standard of Proof, Constructive Notice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sumners Limited
Claimant/applicant
The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord's obligation to repair arose only upon notice
- 2 Whether the claimant proved that notice of disrepair was given before January 1998
- 3 Whether the trial judge applied the correct standard of proof
Ratio Decidendi
The landlord's obligation to repair arose only upon notice, which was not proven to have been given before January 1998. The trial judge applied the correct standard of proof. The costs orders were within the judge's discretion and no error of principle was shown.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused in its entirety
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment