T v Secretary of State for the Home Department

T v Secretary of State for the Home Department

The Adjudicator made no error of law in his credibility assessment of the appellant's asylum claim, took proper account of the appellant's age, and his reasoning was rational and supported by evidence. The appeal was dismissed as the complaints were factual, not legal errors.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: T; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 April 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal (asylum and Immigration) / Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Credibility Assessment, Persecution Based on Religion, Children in Asylum Proceedings, Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

T

Claimant/appellant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (asylum and Immigration) / Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Adjudicator erred in law in rejecting the appellant's credibility as a Pentecostal Christian and risk of persecution
  2. 2 Whether proper allowances were made for the appellant's age as a minor
  3. 3 Whether the Adjudicator failed to consider relevant evidence or acted irrationally

Ratio Decidendi

The Adjudicator made no error of law in his credibility assessment of the appellant's asylum claim, took proper account of the appellant's age, and his reasoning was rational and supported by evidence. The appeal was dismissed as the complaints were factual, not legal errors.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed