T v Secretary of State for the Home Department
The Adjudicator made no error of law in his credibility assessment of the appellant's asylum claim, took proper account of the appellant's age, and his reasoning was rational and supported by evidence. The appeal was dismissed as the complaints were factual, not legal errors.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: T; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (asylum and Immigration) / Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, Persecution Based on Religion, Children in Asylum Proceedings, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (asylum and Immigration) / Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Adjudicator erred in law in rejecting the appellant's credibility as a Pentecostal Christian and risk of persecution
- 2 Whether proper allowances were made for the appellant's age as a minor
- 3 Whether the Adjudicator failed to consider relevant evidence or acted irrationally
Ratio Decidendi
The Adjudicator made no error of law in his credibility assessment of the appellant's asylum claim, took proper account of the appellant's age, and his reasoning was rational and supported by evidence. The appeal was dismissed as the complaints were factual, not legal errors.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment