ITAU BBA International Ltd, Re [2012] EWHC 1783 (Ch) (28 June 2012)
The definition of 'existing transferee company' in the Merger Regulations should be construed to exclude only companies formed for the purposes of a merger by formation of a new company, not all companies formed for the purposes of a merger. The Company qualifies as an existing transferee company and the court has jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 1783 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Itau BBA International Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim / Application for Declaration and Orders Under Companies (cross Border Mergers) Regulations 2007
- Outcome
- Declaration granted
- Legal Topics
- Cross Border Mergers, Interpretation of Statutory Definitions, Directive 2005/56/ec Implementation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Itau BBA International Limited
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim / Application for Declaration and Orders Under Companies (cross Border Mergers) Regulations 2007
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a company formed for the purposes of a merger can be an 'existing transferee company' under the Companies (Cross-Border Mergers) Regulations 2007
Ratio Decidendi
The definition of 'existing transferee company' in the Merger Regulations should be construed to exclude only companies formed for the purposes of a merger by formation of a new company, not all companies formed for the purposes of a merger. The Company qualifies as an existing transferee company and the court has jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted
Orders
- The Company is an 'existing transferee company' within the meaning of the Merger Regulations
- The court has jurisdiction to entertain the application
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment