Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Ltd & Ors v Warner-Lambert Company LLC [2022] EWHC 189 (Pat) (03 February 2022)
Pfizer is precluded from amending its defence to raise new defences under section 70(2A) of the Patents Act 1977 to the unjustifiable threats claim, as the issue was finally determined by Birss J's order of 16 March 2020. Amendments to exclude damages for off-label use for IPCs are refused as having no realistic prospect of success and being contrary to the established counterfactual approach. Amendments based on the construction of the NHS Guidance Order are refused as drafted but may be permitted if limited to factual foreseeability. Amendments to exclude damages for supply of pregabalin used for IPCs on grounds of illegality or equity are refused as an abuse of process and on case...
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 189 (Pat)
- Parties
- Inquiry Claimant: Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited; Inquiry Claimant: Secretary of State for Health and Social Care; Inquiry Claimant: The NHS Commissioning Board (NHS England); Inquiry Claimant: The Welsh Ministers; Inquiry Claimant: The Department of Health in Northern Ireland; Inquiry Claimant: The Regional Health and Social Care Board (Health and Social Care Board); Inquiry Claimant: The Scottish Ministers; Inquiry Claimant: Scottish Health Boards (8-21); Inquiry Defendant: Warner-Lambert Company LLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Damages Inquiry and Unjustifiable Threats Claim / Application to Amend Pleadings and Related Procedural Applications
- Outcome
- Pfizer's applications to amend its pleadings are largely refused; some amendments permitted in principle subject to further particulars; Dr Reddy's application to strike out is refused at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Cross Undertaking in Damages, Unjustifiable Threats, Patent Infringement, Illegality Doctrine, Case Management, Amendment of Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited
Inquiry Claimant
Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
Inquiry Claimant
The NHS Commissioning Board (NHS England)
Inquiry Claimant
The Welsh Ministers
Inquiry Claimant
The Department of Health in Northern Ireland
Inquiry Claimant
The Regional Health and Social Care Board (Health and Social Care Board)
Inquiry Claimant
The Scottish Ministers
Inquiry Claimant
Scottish Health Boards (8-21)
Inquiry Claimant
Warner-Lambert Company LLC
Inquiry Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Damages Inquiry and Unjustifiable Threats Claim / Application to Amend Pleadings and Related Procedural Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Pfizer can amend its defence to raise new defences to the unjustifiable threats claim under section 70(2A) of the Patents Act 1977
- 2 Whether damages for off-label use of pregabalin for inflammatory pain (IPCs) should be excluded from quantum calculations
- 3 Whether amendments based on the construction of the NHS Guidance Order should be permitted
Ratio Decidendi
Pfizer is precluded from amending its defence to raise new defences under section 70(2A) of the Patents Act 1977 to the unjustifiable threats claim, as the issue was finally determined by Birss J's order of 16 March 2020. Amendments to exclude damages for off-label use for IPCs are refused as having no realistic prospect of success and being contrary to the established counterfactual approach. Amendments based on the construction of the NHS Guidance Order are refused as drafted but may be permitted if limited to factual foreseeability. Amendments to exclude damages for supply of pregabalin used for IPCs on grounds of illegality or equity are refused as an abuse of process and on case...
Court Disposition
Pfizer's applications to amend its pleadings are largely refused; some amendments permitted in principle subject to further particulars; Dr Reddy's application to strike out is refused at this stage.
Orders
- Pfizer refused permission to amend its defence to raise new defences under section 70(2A) to the unjustifiable threats claim.
- Pfizer refused permission to amend to exclude damages for off-label use for IPCs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment