ION Science Limited & Anor v Persons Unknown & Ors
The court granted proprietary injunction, worldwide freezing order, and ancillary disclosure order against persons unknown, and Bankers Trust disclosure orders against Binance Holdings and Payment Ventures, finding a serious issue to be tried, a good arguable case for jurisdiction, real risk of dissipation, and exceptional circumstances justifying alternative service, based on the evidence of cryptocurrency fraud and the need to preserve assets and identify wrongdoers.
- Parties
- First Claimant/applicant: ION Science Limited; Second Claimant/applicant: Duncan Johns; First Defendant/respondent: Persons Unknown (connected to 'Neo Capital', aliases Marilyn Black, Claire Jones, Robert Welsh, Carey Jones, Mia Davis, Grant Ford); Second Defendant/respondent: Binance Holdings Limited; Third Defendant/respondent: Payment Ventures Inc.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial Court, Qbd) / Ex Parte Interim Application for Proprietary Injunction, Worldwide Freezing Order, Disclosure Orders, and Permission for Alternative Service
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Cryptocurrency Fraud, Proprietary Injunction, Worldwide Freezing Order, Disclosure (bankers Trust Order), Service Out of Jurisdiction, Persons Unknown, Jurisdiction, Equitable Proprietary Claim, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Deceit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ION Science Limited
First Claimant/applicant
Duncan Johns
Second Claimant/applicant
Persons Unknown (connected to 'Neo Capital', aliases Marilyn Black, Claire Jones, Robert Welsh, Carey Jones, Mia Davis, Grant Ford)
First Defendant/respondent
Binance Holdings Limited
Second Defendant/respondent
Payment Ventures Inc.
Third Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial Court, Qbd) / Ex Parte Interim Application for Proprietary Injunction, Worldwide Freezing Order, Disclosure Orders, and Permission for Alternative Service
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether cryptoassets such as bitcoin are property at common law
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction over persons unknown and foreign respondents
- 3 Whether proprietary injunction and worldwide freezing order should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted proprietary injunction, worldwide freezing order, and ancillary disclosure order against persons unknown, and Bankers Trust disclosure orders against Binance Holdings and Payment Ventures, finding a serious issue to be tried, a good arguable case for jurisdiction, real risk of dissipation, and exceptional circumstances justifying alternative service, based on the evidence of cryptocurrency fraud and the need to preserve assets and identify wrongdoers.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Proprietary injunction against persons unknown (Neo Capital)
- Worldwide freezing order against persons unknown (Neo Capital)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment