Chauhan v Chauhan

Chauhan v Chauhan

The applicant failed to demonstrate any real prospect of success on appeal, no important point of principle or practice was raised, and there was no evidence of bias or procedural irregularity. The lower courts exercised their discretion properly and the orders were justified on the evidence.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Mr Chauhan; Defendant/respondent: Mrs Chauhan
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 May 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (family Law) / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Outcome
Application for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Custody, Periodical Payments, Attachment of Earnings, Appeal Procedure, Variation of Orders, Human Rights
Family Law Civil Procedure Custody Periodical Payments Attachment of Earnings Appeal Procedure Variation of Orders Human Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Chauhan

Claimant/appellant

Mrs Chauhan

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (family Law) / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the lower courts erred in refusing permission to appeal orders relating to custody and financial arrangements
  2. 2 Whether the refusal to allow tape-recording of CAFCASS interviews breached the applicant's rights
  3. 3 Whether there was bias or procedural irregularity in the conduct of the proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to demonstrate any real prospect of success on appeal, no important point of principle or practice was raised, and there was no evidence of bias or procedural irregularity. The lower courts exercised their discretion properly and the orders were justified on the evidence.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Applications refused
  • Transcript of judgment to be supplied to appellant at public expense