Varsani & Ors v Jesani & Ors [1998] EWCA Civ 630 (3 April 1998)
The court has jurisdiction under s.13(1)(e)(iii) Charities Act 1993 to make a scheme for the division of the charity's assets between the two groups, as the original purpose has ceased to provide a suitable and effective method of using the property due to the schism. It is unnecessary to determine which group...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] EWCA Civ 630
- Parties
- Plaintiffs/respondents: Premji Devraj Varsani & Others; First Defendant/appellant: Jinabhai Ramji Jesani; Second Defendant/appellant: Mavji Karsan Patel; Intervener: Her Majesty's Attorney-General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Cy Près Doctrine, Charitable Trusts, Schism in Religious Charities, Jurisdiction to Make Schemes, Interpretation of Charitable Purposes
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Premji Devraj Varsani & Others
Plaintiffs/respondents
Jinabhai Ramji Jesani
First Defendant/appellant
Mavji Karsan Patel
Second Defendant/appellant
Her Majesty's Attorney-General
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the court have jurisdiction to make a scheme for division of a religious charity's assets following a schism?
- 2 Is it necessary to determine which group adheres to the original faith before making such a scheme?
- 3 Does s.13(1)(e)(iii) Charities Act 1993 apply in these circumstances?
Ratio Decidendi
The court has jurisdiction under s.13(1)(e)(iii) Charities Act 1993 to make a scheme for the division of the charity's assets between the two groups, as the original purpose has ceased to provide a suitable and effective method of using the property due to the schism. It is unnecessary to determine which group adheres to the original faith, as the impasse cannot be resolved by the court and the spirit of the gift supports a scheme benefiting both groups.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal of the minority group dismissed with costs
- Attorney-General to pay his own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment