Peters v East Midlands Strategic Health Authority & Ors

Peters v East Midlands Strategic Health Authority & Ors

The claimant is entitled as of right to damages for future care and accommodation from the tortfeasor, rather than being compelled to rely on local authority provision. The statutory disregard applies to all heads of personal injury damages, so the local authority cannot take the damages into account for means-testing. There is no real risk of double recovery due to the undertakings and mechanisms involving the Court of Protection. The judge's findings on the suitability of The Spinnies and the reasonableness of self-funding were justified. The appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Chantelle Peters (by her Litigation Friend Susan Mary Miles); Defendants/appellants: East Midlands Strategic Health Authority and Dr P Halstead; Defendant/appellant: Nottingham City Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 March 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Damages Assessment, Statutory Care Provision, Mitigation of Loss, Double Recovery, Interpretation of Statutory Disregard Provisions
Personal Injury Public Law Social Welfare Law Damages Assessment Statutory Care Provision Mitigation of Loss Double Recovery Interpretation of Statutory Disregard Provisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chantelle Peters (by her Litigation Friend Susan Mary Miles)

Claimant/respondent

East Midlands Strategic Health Authority and Dr P Halstead

Defendants/appellants

Nottingham City Council

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether all heads of personal injury damages are disregarded for means-testing under statutory care provisions
  2. 2 Whether a claimant is entitled as of right to damages from a tortfeasor rather than relying on statutory care provision
  3. 3 Whether it was reasonable for the claimant to opt for self-funding rather than local authority provision

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant is entitled as of right to damages for future care and accommodation from the tortfeasor, rather than being compelled to rely on local authority provision. The statutory disregard applies to all heads of personal injury damages, so the local authority cannot take the damages into account for means-testing. There is no real risk of double recovery due to the undertakings and mechanisms involving the Court of Protection. The judge's findings on the suitability of The Spinnies and the reasonableness of self-funding were justified. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The claimant is entitled to the full award for future care and accommodation as assessed by the trial judge.
  • The statutory disregard applies to all heads of personal injury damages for means-testing by the local authority.